Will Beta

Main Menu

  • Volatility
  • Systematic Risk
  • Returns Of Assets
  • Beta Data
  • Finance Debt

Will Beta

Header Banner

Will Beta

  • Volatility
  • Systematic Risk
  • Returns Of Assets
  • Beta Data
  • Finance Debt
Finance Debt
Home›Finance Debt›CFPB settles with payment processors and landlords | PC Weiner Brodsky Kider

CFPB settles with payment processors and landlords | PC Weiner Brodsky Kider

By Rogers Jennifer
June 11, 2022
0
0

The CFPB recently concluded a consent order against two payment processors and their owners – individually – resolving an administrative enforcement proceeding based on alleged violations of the Consumer Financial Protection Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule. Payment processors provided account management and payment processing services to consumers across the United States who were enrolled in debt relief programs. The consent order requires payment processors and individual owners to repay consumers $8.7 million in fees and pay a civil penalty of $3 million. In addition, individual owners and one of the payment processing entities are permanently excluded from the debt relief payment processing and account maintenance sectors.

The CFPB made several specific findings of violation in the Consent Order:

  • payment processors designed and implemented policies and procedures that allowed student loan debt relief service providers to levy advance fees in violation of the TSR;
  • the payment processors were affiliated with debt relief service providers that required consumers to place funds for debt relief service fees in accounts operated by the payment processors in violation of the TSR;
  • payment processors were paying commissions to third-party marketing companies for consumer business referrals in violation of the TSR;
  • payment processors have engaged in deceptive acts or practices by falsely representing that they are independent of debt relief service providers in violation of the CFPA; and
  • payment processors engaged in deceptive acts or practices in violation of the CFPA when they failed to deliver on their promises to consumers to withhold fee payments to debt relief service providers until confirmation that (1) the consumers complied with their debt consolidation agreements and (2) the debt relief service provider had won the charges.

Related posts:

  1. Capa India says second wave could lead to aviation industry collapse
  2. Apollo Global Management LLC (APO) Q1 2021 Earnings Call Transcript
  3. Is News Corporation (NWSA) a smart long-term buy?
  4. Glatfelter Reports First Quarter 2021 Results

Recent Posts

  • Racing Louisville uses transfer window to build asset base
  • Global Beta-Eudesmol Market 2022 to 2028 Growth Prospects and Key Industry Players Santa Cruz Biotechnology (SCBT), Merck KGaA (Sigma-Aldrich), AdooQ – Instant Interview
  • Saris Cycling Group, victim of the “Covid whiplash”, restructures to be sold
  • Fatigue Impacts Sexual Problems in Chinese Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus | BMC Women’s Health
  • Investor opinion: “Baillie Gifford taught me…

Archives

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021

Categories

  • Beta Data
  • Finance Debt
  • Returns Of Assets
  • Systematic Risk
  • Volatility
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy