Will Beta

Main Menu

  • Volatility
  • Systematic Risk
  • Returns Of Assets
  • Beta Data
  • Finance Debt

Will Beta

Header Banner

Will Beta

  • Volatility
  • Systematic Risk
  • Returns Of Assets
  • Beta Data
  • Finance Debt
Systematic Risk
Home›Systematic Risk›Ambulatory hysterectomy vs ambulatory hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Ambulatory hysterectomy vs ambulatory hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

By Rogers Jennifer
June 25, 2021
0
0



Goal: The objective is to study whether ambulatory hysterectomies (OH) have advantages over hospital hysterectomies (HI) on postoperative complications, readmissions, operative results, cost and patient quality of life.

Information source: A systematic search for studies comparing OH to HI was conducted via PubMed, SAGE, and Scopus from January 2010 to March 2020, with no limitations in language and study design.

Study selection methods: Studies reporting the differences between same-day and overnight discharge after hysterectomy were included. The results of the study were the overall complication rate, type of complication, readmission after discharge, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), payer savings, hospital savings, and quality of care. health-related life (HrQoL). A meta-analysis with sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyzes was performed.

Tabulation, integration and results: Eight studies published between 2011 and 2019 with 104,466 patients undergoing hysterectomy were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All of the included studies except one were at high risk of bias. OH compared to HI had a lower overall complication rate (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.60-0.82), a lower rate of wound infection (OR: 0.60 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.84), urinary tract infection (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.52-0.78), need for transfusion (OR: 0, 36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59), sepsis (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.17-0.64), uncontrolled pain (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.95) and bleeding requiring medical attention (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.94). In addition, patients with OH had a lower readmission rate (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.87), duration of surgery (DMS: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.61, -0.08) and lower estimated blood loss (DMS: -0.63, 95% CI: -0.93, -0.33) compared to HI . Qualitative analysis revealed that the OH had a lower HrQoL and a lower cost to both the hospital and the payer.

Conclusion: OH has fewer complications, a lower readmission rate, lower estimated blood loss, shorter surgery time, and a cost / benefit ratio compared to HI, but patients appear to have less HrQol good during the first postoperative week after OH. The high risk of bias of the included studies indicates that well-designed clinical trials and standardization of reporting of surgical complications are essential to better address this problem.



Related posts:

  1. A global systematic review and meta-analysis
  2. Smart investing: minimizing the risks of market-linked investments
  3. Salt Reduction Results: Reducing Daily Intake By Four Grams Most Effective In Reducing CVD Risk: A 30-Year Modeling Study
  4. New NIST Revisions Expand Scope of Cyber ​​Supply Chain Risk Management Guidelines | Item
Tagshigh risk

Recent Posts

  • How to Install Windows 11 2H22 Beta Now
  • City of Memphis helps employees with financial wellness programs – InsuranceNewsNet
  • New clashes in Tripoli highlight Libya’s political volatility | Political news
  • Boston Properties Completes Acquisition of Madison Center for $730 Million | News
  • Infected food web and ecological stability

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021

Categories

  • Beta Data
  • Finance Debt
  • Returns Of Assets
  • Systematic Risk
  • Volatility
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy